Skip to main content

As we reflect on the siblings who fail to qualify or refuse to believe, we consider their behaviors and how they might treat their siblings who abide by the Creator’s Design and await their inheritance of Eternal Life. It is certainly painful, and seems unloving and unfriendly, to even imagine that some siblings could lose a piece of the Creator’s most profound and desired inheritance: eternal life and overcoming death. How can anyone believe in the possibility that the Creator, who desired children, would deny any sibling an equal share of the most valuable inheritance of eternal life? From the moment of conception, everyone has the opportunity to win this eternal inheritance, yet simultaneously, they inherit the capital death by the end of their earthly life.

If every sibling were to win an equal share in the ultimate inheritance treasure regardless of their choices and responses, or even if they did not participate in the Creator’s Design of the prerequisites before the promise is fulfilled, and the participation and fulfillment of the completion and fulfilling the prerequisites as they turn into a complete and eternal life-giving requirements—as well as the expected continuation of rules governing our relationship with our sibling humans and our Creator’s eternal continuation of demanding the due homage, worship, and fulfilled sacrifices as a testament to the Creator's authority over everything, including life and eternal life—we must remember that merely abiding by all the requisites does not by themselves overcome death and grant eternal life, but is dependent on the Creator and not separate from the Creator.

Moreover, the Creator’s design testifies to an order that we observe in all creation, and to fairness, equality, ethics, and justice which dictate that rewards for choices and responses of opposing and contradictory merits and effects cannot be valued equally. Those who reject and harm their offspring may cause them to shorten their living life, depriving them of opportunities to reflect, understand, and abide by the Creator’s conditions to gain eternal life, and cannot justly be valued equally to those who assist, remain unharmed, and abide by the Creator's requirements for homage, worship, and sacrifices. Additionally, those who dedicate their time and energy to abide, obey, offer worship, homage, and sacrifices to any human or creature that cannot overcome permanent death, or offering undue worship to anything other than the deserving Creator, are robbing and insulting the Creator and his authority, which is a grave offense.

The most valuable pursuit we can engage in is the inheritance of eternal life. Therefore, any other value that does not include the inheritance of eternal life—regardless of its appeal or how many siblings need, admire, or desire it—remains impermanent and cannot substitute for inheriting eternal life. Even our desire to avoid excruciating pain during life cannot equate to winning eternal life. Remember, extreme suffering or extreme acquisition of earthly treasures is confined to earthly life and does not automatically grant us eternal life on their own merit, independent of the Creator completing the capital death on humanity and making available the opportunity to win eternal life.

Therefore, why would a percentage of human siblings choose to focus their efforts on earthly desires, awards, and values while accepting the loss of the highest treasure of eternal life? Given that we possess freedom of choice and response and a desire for justly awarding those deserving and justly evaluating the merit of those choices and responses, abiding by the Creator's design to overcome capital death requires a just system of evaluation. A percentage of the siblings may honor, desire, and value living life desires (such as money, gold, wealth, secular desires) more than the desire for the reward of eternal life, which would imply that any award is as valuable as another award, constituting an insult and dishonor to the Creator’s justice and logic. A reward of living 100 years during life is illogical to treat and desire equally to a reward of living eternally after earthly life ceases. Likewise, to equate redeeming one capital death punishment with another, where one is substituted by offering a gold coin or sacrificing an animal, cannot be considered just, wise, or logical.

Therefore, it is expected that a percentage of the siblings will not inherit eternal life due to not abiding by or rejecting the Creator's design to overcome capital death and to be honored with sacrifices, homage, and worship as the author of everything, including life and eternal life. This reflects a fundamental aspect of divine justice: that rewards and consequences are meted out in accordance with adherence to divine laws and the depth of one’s commitment to fulfilling the Creator’s prerequisites for eternal life.

Furthermore, those who understand or choose not to believe in the Creator’s Design to overcome death and instead focus on living life goals, wishes, addictions, opinions, views, and desires may gain more of such earthly rewards and entice siblings who once believed gaining eternal life was the most valuable treasure. They may manipulate these siblings into pursuing earthly goals. Losing the Ultimate Goal of Life, which is inheriting eternal life, is the true treasure, and all other goals gained during the living life end once someone dies, making the loss astronomical and devastating in comparison. The issue is that the Creator's design must abide by fairness, ethics, equality, and justice, and therefore, the final evaluation of the outcome is reserved until after death. Yet, this does not mean we are clueless travelers; rather, we are purposeful journeyers.

Thus far, we have relied mainly on logic and observed evidence to construct our most logical guide of unseen events from the first creation of the original parents to the judgment of whether we have abided by the prerequisites to gain eternal life or not. We expect prerequisites that highlight the general guide to our relationships with other humans and creatures, maintaining certain expectations from siblings for peace, justice, and ethical conduct so that we do not obstruct others on their most important journey to gain the greatest treasure of eternal life. Additionally, certain expectations govern our relationship with the Creator, who is the author of eternal life and deserving of homage, worship, and sacrifices, including life, to symbolize the Creator as the source of eternal life.

Therefore, while the overcoming of capital death and determining the final gain or loss result of the Ultimate Goal of Life, which is the inheritance of eternal life, depends solely on the Creator, logically, we are expected to fulfill certain requirements that align with the Creator’s Design while doing our best to avoid the logical and expected choices, responses, opinions, views, and faith that could gradually or abruptly lead us off track. Furthermore, because of our senses and habituation, either following the correct path or gradually deviating from the path produces addictions that make it harder to amend our choices.

In other words, because we expect the Creator to judge with utmost justice, we bear accountability for those acting in charge of our choices and responses while we are unable, for some reason, since we are siblings and due to various reasons some put trust in others to choose for them until they can but could bear the result. A young child is at the mercy of those entrusted to their care, and their choices could at the least impact the child's life and could have an impact on the judgment after death. We can judge during life with certain precautions and limitations, and our best judgment could match the final Creator’s judgment or not. As such, we have obvious signs to judge by, yet they are limited and cannot be finalized while the individual is living and able to make choices and responses, and we are not the author and giver of eternal life, thus the final judgment based on utmost justice is after death and by the Creator to decide the final verdicts on how to whom distribute His eternal life treasure.

Just as a sports coach observes how the students practice before the preparation and game, the spectators could have a good idea who may win the race, but surprises are possible to change the expected end result. As long as the game is being played, the final judgment of the winner is not announced, but observers can see the weaknesses and the bad habits of one opponent making it harder to win, yet refraining from announcing the final result of who won until the game ends. Therefore, we expect that not all habits, choices, opinions, views, and weaknesses are beneficial if they persist and are not corrected, although some minor bad habits and weaknesses may remain even for the most disciplined and dedicated individuals to the Creator’s Design. Just as any disciplined athlete aiming to win the final match requires discipline, reflection on the areas needing improvement, and improving the good areas so as not to get prideful in their own strong offensive techniques that could blind the athlete to improve their defense to avoid and prevent possible failing to defend an unexpected attack and lose the entire desired outcome.